Jason Chaffetz argues that the 2028 United States presidential election will largely revolve around how the country chooses to respond to the transformative impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on society and the economy. He suggests that neither major political party has yet articulated a clear vision for dealing with the far-reaching effects of AI — from job displacement and economic reorganization to questions about the role of government in managing technological change. According to Chaffetz, this gap in political leadership could make AI the defining issue of the next election cycle.
Chaffetz highlights visions of an AI-driven future — such as Elon Musk’s concept of “universal high income” — as raising deep questions about economic security, meaningful work, and societal values. He challenges readers and policymakers to consider how longstanding American principles like individual liberty, free markets, and limited government align with an AI-centric economy, where traditional labor markets may shrink and economic incentives shift dramatically. The article suggests the election will test whether voters want to uphold these principles or lean toward more collectivist solutions in response to AI’s disruption.
The piece argues that public policy on AI will influence virtually every other issue — from education and job training to economic regulation and international competitiveness — and that political alignments may shift as a result. Chaffetz contends that both parties will face pressure to articulate bold positions on AI governance, economic redistribution, and technological leadership, making AI not just a technological topic but a political wedge issue shaping voter preferences and campaign debates.
Despite the risks, Chaffetz expresses cautious optimism, suggesting that AI could empower Americans by creating new roles and opportunities, especially in strategic and creative fields that machines cannot fully replicate. He emphasizes that the nation must steer AI in ways that amplify human potential and innovation, while addressing challenges like disinformation, deepfakes, and economic inequality — otherwise the 2028 election will serve as a referendum on both technology and the values that guide its adoption.
