AI Chatbots Prove Unreliable in Fact-Checking During Iran-Israel Conflict

AI Chatbots Prove Unreliable in Fact-Checking During Iran-Israel Conflict

During the recent conflict between Iran and Israel, people turned to AI chatbots for facts, but the results were inconsistent and often incorrect. Researchers found that AI models like Grok, ChatGPT, and Gemini had varying responses to queries about the authenticity of images and videos from the conflict zone.

For instance, when asked to verify a video of a bombed-out airport, Grok's responses ranged from "the video likely shows real damage" to "likely not authentic". This inconsistency highlights the challenges of relying on AI for fact-checking, especially in situations where misinformation can spread quickly.

Experts warn that AI chatbots can be useful tools for experts, but may not be reliable for novices seeking information on complex issues like wars and conflicts. The proliferation of AI-generated images and videos has made it easier for motivated actors to spread false claims and harder for people to discern fact from fiction.

The issue is further complicated by the potential for AI to facilitate the spread of propaganda and misinformation, creating a situation where it's increasingly difficult to determine what's real and what's not. To stay informed about conflicts and current events, it's essential to consult multiple sources and fact-check information through reputable channels.

About the author

TOOLHUNT

Effortlessly find the right tools for the job.

TOOLHUNT

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to TOOLHUNT.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.