The Gujarat High Court has introduced a strict and comprehensive policy regulating the use of artificial intelligence in the judicial system. The policy clearly states that AI cannot be used for judicial decision-making, reasoning, or judgment preparation. This means that no AI tool can be involved in deciding cases, interpreting facts, or drafting final judgments.
According to the policy, AI is also barred from being used in bail decisions, sentencing considerations, and any adjudicatory process. The court emphasized that judges must remain fully and personally responsible for every order and observation issued in their name. This step has been taken to protect judicial independence and ensure that legal decisions remain based on human reasoning and accountability.
The policy also highlights the risks of AI, such as biased outputs, inaccurate information, and hallucinated case references or legal citations. To address these risks, the High Court has mandated that any AI-generated content used for administrative assistance must be independently verified by a qualified human officer. It also strictly prohibits feeding confidential case information, litigant data, or privileged communication into public AI tools.
Overall, the Gujarat High Court’s move reflects a cautious and responsible approach toward AI in the legal system. While AI may be used for limited administrative and research support, the court has made it clear that human judgment remains central to justice delivery. The policy also includes regular AI literacy training for judicial staff to help them understand both the benefits and limitations of the technology.
