The article discusses how artificial intelligence is reshaping intellectual property (IP) rights and the creative landscape in India. With AI tools increasingly used to generate art, music, writing, and other creative outputs, there is growing debate over who owns the rights to AI‑assisted works. Traditional copyright frameworks were designed for human creators, and existing laws offer limited clarity on whether AI‑generated content should be treated the same way or require new legal definitions and protections.
One major concern for artists and creative professionals is that AI systems are often trained on large datasets that include copyrighted works without explicit permission from the original creators. This has led to fears that AI could undermine the value of human‑made art, dilute authorship rights, and reduce the economic benefits artists receive from their work. Questions arise about whether the creators of the training data, the developers of the AI, or the users of AI tools should hold copyright or be entitled to compensation.
Legal experts cited in the article argue that India’s IP regime needs reform to address these challenges. They suggest updating copyright definitions to clarify the status of AI‑generated works, establishing guidelines for fair use of training data, and exploring licensing frameworks that ensure creators are fairly remunerated when their works contribute to AI training. Without such reforms, disputes over ownership and compensation are likely to increase as AI becomes more embedded in creative industries.
The article also notes the potential benefits of AI for artists, such as new tools for creativity, collaboration, and productivity. However, it emphasizes that for these benefits to be equitable, policy frameworks must balance innovation with robust protections for human creators. Strengthening IP laws, enhancing enforcement mechanisms, and providing clear legal guidance will be critical to ensuring that India’s creative economy thrives in the age of artificial intelligence.
