Texas lawmakers are pushing back against a recent federal executive order that seeks to limit states’ ability to regulate artificial intelligence. The order, issued by former President Donald Trump, aims to discourage state-level AI laws by threatening the withdrawal of certain federal funds from states whose regulations are deemed overly restrictive. This move has sparked strong opposition in Texas, where legislators argue that it undermines state authority and weakens local protections against emerging AI-related risks.
Republican and Democratic lawmakers alike have emphasized that states need flexibility to respond to the real-world impacts of AI, especially in areas such as child safety, consumer protection, privacy, and civil rights. Texas legislators argue that AI technologies are advancing faster than federal policy, making state action essential to close regulatory gaps. They also stress that responsible regulation does not stifle innovation but instead builds public trust and encourages safer adoption of AI systems.
Opponents of the executive order contend that federal preemption through executive action raises constitutional concerns, noting that only Congress has the authority to override state laws. From their perspective, using funding pressure to influence state legislation sets a troubling precedent and risks leaving communities unprotected while national rules remain uncertain or delayed. Lawmakers argue that states are often better positioned to understand local challenges and tailor AI oversight accordingly.
Texas has already passed its own Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act, scheduled to take effect in 2026. The law places limits on harmful uses of AI, addresses biometric data and civil rights concerns, and establishes advisory and oversight mechanisms. Supporters say the state’s approach demonstrates that innovation and regulation can coexist, and they warn that blocking such efforts could slow progress toward safer, more accountable AI across the country.
